Home Exam Structure Topics Past Papers Resources Homework About Contact
Home Exam Structure Topics Past Papers Resources Homework About Contact

Home / Estimation / Rounding

3.3b · Estimation · Sub-skill

Rounding

Rounding to a sensible degree of accuracy — decimal places, significant figures, and choosing the right precision for the context.

Build it up, step by step

Understanding rounding

Click each step below to reveal it — work through them in order the first time round.

Step 1 · Decimal places

1 of 4

To round to a given number of decimal places (d.p.), look at the digit after the last one you're keeping. If it's 5 or more, round up; otherwise round down. E.g. 3.647 rounded to 1 d.p. is 3.6 (the next digit, 4, is less than 5).

Step 2 · Significant figures

2 of 4

The first significant figure is the first non-zero digit; count significant figures (s.f.) from there, including any zeros in between. E.g. 0.004072 to 2 s.f. is 0.0041. Significant figures are especially useful for very large or very small numbers.

Step 3 · Choosing an appropriate degree of accuracy

3 of 4

The context of a question tells you how precise your answer should be. Money is usually rounded to 2 decimal places (the nearest penny); a population might be rounded to 3 significant figures. Over-rounding loses useful information; under-rounding implies false precision.

Step 4 · Rounding errors and bounds

4 of 4

Every time you round a number, you introduce a small error. If a length is given as 12 cm to the nearest cm, the true value could be anywhere from 11.5 cm up to (but not including) 12.5 cm — these are the lower and upper bounds. Rounding error matters especially when you do further calculations with already-rounded figures.

Worked example

Round 58,439 to (a) the nearest 1000, (b) 2 significant figures.

(a) The digit after the thousands place is 4 (hundreds digit), so round down: 58,000.
(b) The first two significant figures are 5 and 8; the next digit is 4, so round down: 58,000.

Test yourself

Past-paper style question

A stadium's attendance is recorded as 24,850, correct to the nearest 10.

(a) Write down the upper and lower bounds for the actual attendance.
(b) A newspaper reports the attendance as ‘about 25,000, to 2 significant figures.’ Explain whether this is an appropriate degree of accuracy for a newspaper headline. [4 marks]

Show the answer

(a) Lower bound = 24,845, Upper bound = 24,855 (the true value could be anywhere from 24,845 up to but not including 24,855).

(b) Yes, this is appropriate — for a general newspaper headline, readers don't need the exact attendance to the nearest person; rounding to 2 significant figures gives a clear, easy-to-read sense of scale, which is all that's needed in this context.

Practice

Rounding worksheet

Five short questions on rounding. Work through them, then reveal the mark scheme to check.

  1. Round 7.386 to 2 decimal places.
  2. Round 0.02938 to 2 significant figures.
  3. Round 1,461,900 to 3 significant figures.
  4. A length is measured as 8 cm to the nearest cm. Write down the upper and lower bounds of the actual length.
  5. Explain why it would be inappropriate to state the average number of children per UK family as ‘1.7893 children,’ rather than ‘about 1.8 children.’

Mark scheme

  1. 7.39.
  2. 0.029.
  3. 1,460,000.
  4. Lower bound = 7.5 cm, upper bound = 8.5 cm.
  5. Stating ‘1.7893 children’ implies a false level of precision, since you cannot have a fraction of a child in reality and the underlying data is not that precise; ‘1.8’ gives an appropriately rounded, more meaningful figure for this context.
← Back to Estimation